Christopher Hansteen’s Norwegian measures and weights
Professor Christopher Hansteen is a central name in Norwegian history of science, but few people know that he introduced a special Norwegian system of measures and weights immediately after Norway’s separation from Denmark in 1814.
Norwegian standard weights from 1832: 8, 2 and ½ pounds, designed to implement the 1824 Act on measures and weights. Photo: Leif Halbo
By Leif Halbo
The Danish–Norwegian system of measures and weights was established by the astronomer and mathematician Ole Rømer at the end of the seventeenth century. The Treaty of Kiel that was concluded at the end of the Napoleonic Wars resulted in Norway being separated from Denmark and forced into a personal union with Sweden. In this situation, Hansteen argued vehemently that Norway needed its own measurement system. His arguments included technological advances in measuring techniques, the fact that the old measurement standards were in Copenhagen, and that Norway ought to demonstrate its independence in relation to both Denmark and Sweden. Sweden wanted to bind the union more closely together by introducing the Swedish system of measures and weights in Norway. However, Hansteen held that the Norwegian system that was under development was better, claiming that it would be “more natural that Sweden switch to the Norwegian system”.
The work on the new Act on measures and weights was led by Hansteen. The Storting wanted the new system to be as similar as possible to the old to ensure “as little disruption as possible”. Several foreign measurement systems were assessed as a basis. The decimal-based metric system established in France during the revolution had already been introduced by law in France from 1795. However, it was far too revolutionary for Hansteen and the Storting. Perhaps this is not so strange as it sounds today – even Napoleon himself gave up and went back to the old system in 1812.
New Norwegian foot
Christopher Hansteen. Painting by Johan Gørbitz 1852. UiO's Arts Collection.
New metrology service in 1832
The Supervisory Commission that was to implement the Act was also headed by Hansteen. The Calibration Administration (“Justerforvaltningen”) that was established in 1832 was an important part of the implementation. It consisted of three parts: the Supervisory Commission, a Calibration Office in Christiania, and local outlets. The Supervisory Commission was to oversee the Calibration Office, adjust the standard measures at the local sales outlets, and advise the Ministry and the central administration. The Calibration Office was responsible for the manufacture and control of standard measures and measuring instruments.
The metric system: decadian and simple
As the nineteenth century progressed, there was a growing call among Western scientists and business people for a standard system of measures and weights that was the same in every country. The metric system was generally regarded as best suited as a universal measurement system. The system had been developed by the French Academy of Sciences in the 1790s, as an attempt to create order in the chaos of the different systems of measures and weights in the country. The goal was to create a system that was based on a universal natural measurement that could be reproduced everywhere.
The metre was defined as 1/10 millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole. In the metric system, all units followed the decimal number system, based on multiples of ten. The weight unit was 1 gram, which was defined as the weight of the volume of water in a cube with sides measuring 100th of a metre (i.e. 1 cubic centimetre). Later the kilogram (1000 grams) was adopted as the basic unit of weight. The prototype for the metre was cast in platinum in 1799.
The many different systems of weights and measures that existed complicated international trade, and at the end of the 1860s, parts of the business community advocated the metric system. The matter was debated in the newspaper Morgenbladet and in the Polytechnic Journal. In the early years, it was primarily an academic discussion, with little anchoring in people’s everyday lives. The most ardent opponent was Hansteen, who stuck by his system based on the seconds pendulum. He claimed it would be virtually impossible for craftsmen, traders and ordinary people to learn the metric system. Supporters of the metric system argued that Norway would have to switch to simplify trade and enable Norway to keep up to date with scientific developments in Europe, since most of this was done using metric measures.
The metric system wins
In 1872, the only countries in Europe not to have introduced the metric system were Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Russia and the United Kingdom. The Norwegian Parliarment therefore asked the Supervisory Commission for Measures and Weights to conduct an official study on the issue, but work never really got started, probably because Hansteen was still a member. In the end, a new commission was appointed in January 1873. It unanimously recommended switching to the metric system as quickly as possible.
The new commission stressed the simplicity of the decimal system. The old system was so complicated that “it is unlikely that anyone really remembers all its details”. By contrast, the metric system was so simple that “anyone can learn it in a few minutes, both as a whole and in terms of the names of the various subdivisions”. The Commission’s recommendation was sent to the Supervisory Commission on 9 October 1873. Christopher Hansteen had died earlier that year, and could no longer oppose the new system. On 12 May 1875, the Storting adopted the “Act on metric measures and weights”. On 20 May the same year, the international Metre Convention was signed in Paris.
Standard metre bar from 1840, owned by the Norwegian Metrology and Accreditation Service (Justervesenet). The certificate in the case states that the bar has been calibrated against the first French metre prototype from 1799. When the metric system was finally introduced in France, a standard metre bar was sent out to some 20 countries that France had close contact with, in order to boost confidence in the metric system. Photo: Leif Halbo
Not particularly far-sighted
Christopher Hansteen was the driving force behind the introduction of a Norwegian system of measures that was separate from that used in our neighbouring countries. He felt it was important for Norway’s sense of self. He also ensured a functional system for enforcing the law, which was of paramount importance.
As regards the choice of the technical basis for the measurement system, he can hardly be called particularly forward-sighted, in that he chose the unit of length on the basis of a principle that had been rejected by other countries – by Denmark some 135 years earlier – and promoted a system that was just as complicated as the previous one. Some of the responsibility for this must be attributed to the Storting, which had requested the least possible change, so that old equipment could continue to be used.
The metrology service today
Even though Hansteen’s Act is a thing of the past, the Calibration Administration still lives on in the form of the current Norwegian Metrology and Accreditation Service (Justervesenet) and it plays a more important role than ever. With a global measurement system, it is important for international trade, industrial collaboration and science to ensure that one metre is one metre everywhere: so that a car part manufactured in Norway fits into a Japanese car, so that a kilo of meat weighs exactly one kilo, and so a litre of petrol is one litre at all petrol stations. This is the Norwegian Metrology and Accreditation Service’s responsibility in Norway.
And the metre itself? It has survived the test of time. However, its definition has changed. Today the metre is defined as “the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458 seconds”. How do we measure this? That is another story.
- Justering: Måleteknisk kontroll og godkjenning av at et instrument viser korrekt innenfor gitte grenser.
- Alder, K.: The measure of all things. The seven-year odyssey that transformed the world, Abacus, New York 2004.
- Halbo, L.: Mål, vekt og norsk selvstendighet, Kronikk i Aftenposten 21. juni 2005.
- Hansteen, Chr.: Udkast til et paa Naturen grundet Maal- og Vægt-System for Norge, Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne, nr. 4, 1823, s. 163.
- Hutchison, R.: Fra mangfold til enhet – Justervesenet og historien om mål og vekt i Norge, Justervesenet, 2006.
- Karlsen, A. M.: Innføringen av det metriske systemet i Norge, Volund 2001, Norsk teknisk museum.
- Morgenbladet, 10. mai 1860, 5. desember 1862, 7. mai 1863, 30. mai 1863.
- Seip, J. A.: Ole Jacob Broch og hans samtid. Gyldendal, Oslo 1971.